A Bit on the “Rule of Three” YMCA Policy
The “Rule of Three” is part of the YMCA’s alleged commitment to Child Protection and Child abuse Prevention. Much more on all that in future articles.
For Now Let’s Look at the YMCA Child Protection Policies and Procedures AND Child Abuse Prevention Policy.
The Rule of 3 indicates that if a camper (child in the YMCA camp program) needs to go anywhere on Camp, they must have themselves and two adults.
“No child, regardless of age, should ever enter a bathroom alone on a school campus, field trip or at another off-site location. Children must always be sent in threes (known as the rule of three) with a staff member.”
“Restroom Supervision:
Staff will make sure the restroom is not occupied by suspicious or unknown individuals before allowing children to use the facilities.
Staff will stand in the open doorway of the restroom while children are using the restroom. This allows for audio supervision of children, privacy for children and protection for staff (not placing them in the position of being alone with a child).
In case a younger child needs assistance, doors to the facility must remain open and a second staff is asked to be present.
No child, regardless of age, should ever enter a bathroom alone on a school campus, field trip or at another off-site location. Children must always be sent in threes (known as the rule of three) with a staff member.”
Source of Above YMCA “Rule” “Policy”, number 5 at the link below
Reverend Crystal Cox standing up for Women's Rights at the Rally for Decency in Port Townsend Washington Sept. 3rd 2022.
Who Enforces Human Rights
The Law Says that the Washington State Human Rights Commission (WSHRC) enforces the Washington State Law Against Discrimination. The Washington State Human Rights Commission claims to be nuetral in an investigation however the agency wrote the very law that was used against Julie Jaman, and this agency was in no way neutral. The WA State Human Rights Commission is Biased, Discriminating, Prejudice and Bullying. I have personally witnessed this. They are NOT an ally of a victim of a human rights violation, a hate crime in the state of Washington.
I Cannot Help but WONDER if State Law, Federal Law or the Constitution will even be a factor in the Policies and Procedure of this Human Rights City Process of the City of Port Townsend.
Well, instead of holding City Manager John Mauro accountable for his clear violation of Human Rights and “applicable law”, the City Council Gave him a Raise.
$187k a year to Violate Human Rights. Job Well Done.
Oath? Seriously John?
Bias, Prejudice, Discrimination
Does not EQUAL Human Rights
Personal Preference, Politics, Personal Opinion, ...
So, Whew No Liability for PT Right?
Sure, UNLESS, like a Bull in a China shop as they say, the City steps in, sides with one party with no investigation, counsels, orders or demands the local law take one side with prejudice and discrimination and without any investigation. And then proceeds to incite a violent mob, then defends the mob's actions in the streets, and then the Mayor’s Law Firm represents our assailant’s in court. Well then Ya Liability is a Given. Kind of an Open Shut Case I would say.
It is my Opinion, that the Operating Standards Section of the Operating Agreement,
On Page 2 of the contract, where it says, ( iii. In compliance with all applicable laws;)
Actually means that the YMCA is responsible to make sure the operation is in compliance with “applicable laws” such as a bathroom / changing area to suit those uncomfortable, as per State Law.
Also Per the Operating Agreement, in my Opinion, it is and was the YMCA’s Responsibility and Liability for Violations of Discrimination and Human Rights Laws Such as and not Limited to:
RCW 49.60.400, Discrimination, ...
Port Townsend ~ Human Rights for “Some” “People”
Written Upon the Belief and Knowledge
of Reverend Crystal Cox
All Faith Church
Port Townsend, Washington
Port Townsend City Attorney Heidi Greenwood of the Council Culture and Society Committee invites Olympic Pride Founder to Speak on the Creation of a Declaration of Port Townsend as a Humans Rights City.
Port Townsend Washington DOES NOT Qualify
to Be Labeled as a “Human Rights City”.
Port Townsend is Not a Place of Dignity, Safety, Human Rights, Civil Rights, Equity, and Non-Discrimination for and Equal to All Individuals, Groups, Parties, and Social Status.
Port Townsend is a City of Flat out Discrimination and Blatant Disregard for Human Rights, Safety, Dignity, and Basic Respect, of any individual, class, or group that does not meet the “City’s” Criteria for “Human” or fit their definition of a “People” deserving of “Human Rights” “Non-Discrimination” “Safety” “Dignity” and “Welcoming” .
Port Townsend is a City that picks and chooses who the Laws applies To based ...
